<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Skynet and Other Concepts Best Left to the Imagination</title>
	<atom:link href="http://geeksdreamgirl.com/2009/06/01/skynet-and-other-concepts-best-left-to-the-imagination/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://geeksdreamgirl.com/2009/06/01/skynet-and-other-concepts-best-left-to-the-imagination/</link>
	<description>Geek&#039;s Dream Girl</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 20:58:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicholas</title>
		<link>http://geeksdreamgirl.com/2009/06/01/skynet-and-other-concepts-best-left-to-the-imagination/#comment-46055</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicholas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 17:19:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geeksdreamgirl.com?p=2838#comment-46055</guid>
		<description>I just started watching Sarah Conner Chronicles, so this is good timing for me. 

I think the reason they try to prevent Skynet from being built or destroying it in its infancy, is that it probably has no location anymore. Once Skynet gets onto the internet there is little need for some single terminal somewhere. I&#039;m sure the machines in the future have set up a global wi-fi network for themselves. Skynet is in the air they breathe. It is an omnipresent robot god.

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;i&gt;Nicholas&#180;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DungeonMastering/~3/HlK2vCABJSw/4-epic-campaign-premises-for-badass-pcs&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;4 Epic Campaign Premises for Badass PCs&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just started watching Sarah Conner Chronicles, so this is good timing for me. </p>
<p>I think the reason they try to prevent Skynet from being built or destroying it in its infancy, is that it probably has no location anymore. Once Skynet gets onto the internet there is little need for some single terminal somewhere. I&#8217;m sure the machines in the future have set up a global wi-fi network for themselves. Skynet is in the air they breathe. It is an omnipresent robot god.</p>
<p><abbr><em><i>Nicholas&#180;s last blog post..<a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/DungeonMastering/~3/HlK2vCABJSw/4-epic-campaign-premises-for-badass-pcs" rel="nofollow">4 Epic Campaign Premises for Badass PCs</a></i></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: e</title>
		<link>http://geeksdreamgirl.com/2009/06/01/skynet-and-other-concepts-best-left-to-the-imagination/#comment-45856</link>
		<dc:creator>e</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 05:58:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geeksdreamgirl.com?p=2838#comment-45856</guid>
		<description>Oh, what about the bad guy from Inspector Gadget? We only saw his arm!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, what about the bad guy from Inspector Gadget? We only saw his arm!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graham</title>
		<link>http://geeksdreamgirl.com/2009/06/01/skynet-and-other-concepts-best-left-to-the-imagination/#comment-45683</link>
		<dc:creator>Graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 22:19:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geeksdreamgirl.com?p=2838#comment-45683</guid>
		<description>Agreed, though it is occasionally interesting to see such an AI&#039;s interpretation of itself.

Take the Architect from the Matrix movies, for instance.  His &quot;appearance&quot; as a distinguished man in a white room lets us know a lot about how the Architect sees himself, while never giving us a &quot;pure form&quot; visual (I don&#039;t count the &quot;disembodied voice on the surface of the world&quot; version as a pure interpretation, either).

The Borg Queen from the Star Trek movies is another example, though I don&#039;t think it was done as well.

For the new Terminator movie, a similar &quot;self-interpretation&quot; (projection, or robot that can move independently of Skynet) could be interesting.

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;i&gt;Graham&#180;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/criticalanklebites/~3/QT09vexUEPo/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Oh my, he’s at it again!&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed, though it is occasionally interesting to see such an AI&#8217;s interpretation of itself.</p>
<p>Take the Architect from the Matrix movies, for instance.  His &#8220;appearance&#8221; as a distinguished man in a white room lets us know a lot about how the Architect sees himself, while never giving us a &#8220;pure form&#8221; visual (I don&#8217;t count the &#8220;disembodied voice on the surface of the world&#8221; version as a pure interpretation, either).</p>
<p>The Borg Queen from the Star Trek movies is another example, though I don&#8217;t think it was done as well.</p>
<p>For the new Terminator movie, a similar &#8220;self-interpretation&#8221; (projection, or robot that can move independently of Skynet) could be interesting.</p>
<p><abbr><em><i>Graham&#180;s last blog post..<a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/criticalanklebites/~3/QT09vexUEPo/" rel="nofollow">Oh my, he’s at it again!</a></i></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

